Make englishc.com your home page
首 页 | 英语新闻 | 小学英语 | 中学英语 | 大学英语 | 英语范文 | 英文音乐 | 英文电影 | 生活英语
旅游英语 | 英语文学 | 计算机英语 | 医学英语 | 法律英语 | 商务英语 | 等级考试 | 雅思托福
 
  
大学英语 英语艺术 英语学习 英语新闻 英语文学 英语俚语 英语范文 英语翻译 英文笑话
 
 搜索
 最热英语文档
·最新托福考试作文题选编50
·最新托福考试作文题选编
·浅谈IELTS与TOEFL的差异
·GRE作文点评:高分作文的
·雅思口语高分要诀:流利 关
·雅思口语--回答主动 答案
·2002年以来雅思考过的作文
·雅思口语8分秘笈
·雅思英语考试移民作文大全
·雅思口语考试实战题目
 推荐排行
 
 您现在位置:主页>雅思托福>
IELTS雅思写作技巧及示范
发布时间:2007-12-01 作者:

IELTS雅思写作技巧及示范

 关于IELTS作文,我们是从模仿优秀作文开始,掌握写作套路,在灵活运用词汇的同时,争取写出新意。相信您一定会取得高分。一起来研究下面两篇范文吧,尤其要注意其中的写作技巧点拨。
  
  IELTS写作示范及技巧讲解之一
  
  Task 1 :
  You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
  Topic: Compare the types of communication used in 1962 and in 1982.
  You should write a minimum of 150 words. 
  
  A: Draft
  
  1. Short / Simple Introduction.
  2. Paragraph talking about one behaviour Pattern.
  3. Paragraph talking about contradictory behaviour Pattern.
  Concluding Remark.
  
  B: Model Answers: 
  
  1. General Overview /Introduction.
  The two pie charts compare different methods of communication used in  1962 and 1982. We can see that for the three media surveyed, there are  significant changes for each.
  
  2. Paragraph dealing with information which decreases.
  In 1962, letter writing was the most popular form of communication,  accounting for 50% of the total. However, by 1982, this figure fell to  just 10%, the smallest of that year’s figures. (*In this paragraph, we  make it clear, which time period we are writing about. Don't repeat "the  year" again and again.)
  
  3. Paragraph dealing with information which increases.
  By contrast, we can see that the use of the phone and computers during  this same period have both risen dramatically. The telephone, at 60%  becomes the most used form of communication, rising from 35%. Similarly,  the use of computers, doubles to 30%. (*No need to use 15%. We can  understand OK using this type of phrase.) Overall, we can see some  important changes in the forms of communication employed during the two  decades surveyed. 
  
  
  
  IELTS写作示范及技巧讲解之二 
  
  Task 2 :
  Topic: Most high-level jobs are done by men. Should the government  encourage a certain % of these jobs to be reserved for women? 
   You should spend no more than 40 minutes on this task. You should write  a minimum of 250 words. You should use your own ideas, knowledge and  experience to support your arguments with examples and relevant  evidence. 
  
  A: Draft 
  
  1. Introduction - short statement of opinion. 
  2. Body paragraph (1)(2) Different reasons to support opinion. (3) Statement of opposite point of view "balances" essay. 
  3. Conclusion - summarizes Body. 
  
  B: Model Answers: 
  
  Introduction / opinion 
  Most of the jobs in society that are high-paying, powerful, and demand  a lot of responsibility are held by men. I do not believe this situation  arose because women are incapable of doing high-level work. I believe  society could benefit if more women were in positions of power and  therefore I think the government should reserve a percentage of these  jobs for females. 
  
  Why should government encourage a certain of high level jobs for women? 
  (first reason)Firstly, the problem of unfair employment distribution  appears to come from social convention and not competence or true  ability. At a young age most girls are not encouraged to pursue  political office, business success, or professional prestige. On the  other hand, boys are told to do these things. As a result, men hold the  high level jobs but this does not mean they are very good at what they  do. If the government set a quota for hiring women to do high level  work, such as working in the government itself, then perhaps women would  be more inspired to be ambitious in their life plans and contribute to  a less-than perfect society.
  
  
  (second reason)  Furthermore, regulations in the workplace for hiring women would not be  a new thing. Although not written or made into law, there seems to be  rules for who can and cannot have high-level jobs. For instance, if a  man and a woman both competed for the presidency of a company or even  the country, and both were equally qualified and had the same experience  and background, there is little doubt who would get the job. Even more,  if the man was less qualified and less experienced than the woman, the  man would still probably get the job because of his sex. Therefore, to  legislate a percentage of high level jobs for women would work to fight  the unwritten sexist rules of the workplace. 
  
  (Other points of view: 3-different arguments against my opinion.) 
  
  On the other hand, there are many arguments against the use of a quota  system for women. It is true that the injustice and discrimination could  be reversed. This is to say that some qualified men might be denied a  job while some unqualified women would be given one. Also, the problem  of sexism at work could be worsened instead of being overcome. People  would doubt whether a women with a high level job was "truly capable"-- men might feel bitterness and resentment, while women might think less  of themselves and begin to depend on government "charity". Furthermore,  there is the problem of defining what is a high-level job and  determining an appropriate percentage. ( Final statement that supports  my opinion again.) Nonetheless, a quota system would break down some  barriers in the short-term. Sexism in the workplace will not just  magically disappear. 
  
  Conclusion 
  To sum up, I  have outlined some advantages and disadvantages of making quotas for the  number of women in high-level jobs. Despite some of the obvious  problems I believe that men and women can and should share power,  wealth, and prestige. It is a cause worthy of our efforts.  


  
上一篇:托福考试议论文写作概论   下一篇:雅思考试写作要点

IELTS雅思写作技巧及示范

发表评论
 
用户名:
;
密 码:
 
匿名发表
 
 
※ 相关信息
无相关信息  
 
版权所有:英语资讯网(EnglishC.com)| GoTop
COPYRIGHT © 2006 - 2007 http://www.englishc.com  
鲁ICP备06022101号